Augmented Reality in Online Shopping: Effects on Product Visualization and Consumer Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/trjtm2026.v06.n01.005Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Product Visualization, Online Shopping, Consumer Behaviour, Purchase Confidence, Decision-Making, E-Commerce, Virtual Try-OnAbstract
Online shopping has made product discovery and purchasing considerably more convenient, yet it also creates a persistent information gap: consumers cannot physically inspect, handle, or try a product before completing a transaction. Augmented Reality (AR) offers one way of narrowing this gap by placing digital representations of products within the shopper’s immediate environment. The present study examines how AR-based product visualization affects consumer engagement, purchase confidence, satisfaction, and decision-making in online shopping. A mixed-method design was adopted, combining an online survey of 451 shoppers with five focus group discussions involving 30 participants. The study considers consumers’ awareness and use of AR, their experiences with AR-enabled shopping, purchase-related responses, and perceived barriers to adoption. The reported findings indicate that AR can strengthen product understanding, reduce uncertainty, and increase confidence during online purchase decisions. The results also point to stronger consumer interest in applications such as virtual try-on and furniture visualization, where seeing a product in context can directly address concerns about appearance, fit, or suitability. At the same time, the study identifies practical barriers, including device compatibility, implementation expense, limited platform availability, and concerns about the accuracy of virtual representations. The paper concludes that AR is most valuable when it is accurate, easy to use, accessible across devices, and integrated thoughtfully with personalization technologies. Rather than treating AR simply as a visual novelty, online retailers should view it as a decision-support mechanism that can improve the quality of information available to shoppers.
References
Javornik, A. (2016). Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of AR on consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 252–261.
Pantano, E., & Servidio, R. (2012). Modeling innovative retailing in augmented reality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 279–286.
Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: Exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(6), 884–905.
Smink, A. R., van Reijmersdal, E. A., van Noort, G., & Neijens, P. C. (2019). Shopping in augmented reality: The effects of spatial presence, personalization, and intrusiveness on user experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 459–468.
Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L. (2017). Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 89–103.
Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2019). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and learning effectiveness in educational contexts: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 141, 103632.
Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., & Hinsch, C. (2019). Augmented reality marketing: How mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 43–53.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Wang, Y., Alalwan, A. A., Agyemang, A., & Williams, M. D. (2020). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on consumer intentions to use AR-enabled services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120061.
Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2022). The role of presence in virtual and augmented reality shopping environments. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 357–366.
Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2023). Adoption of augmented reality shopping experiences: The role of perceived enjoyment, usefulness, and ease of use. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(2), 315–328.